<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authority in the Age of the Amateur</title>
	<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/</link>
	<description>Writings and ruminations about emerging technologies, Web 2.0, information architecture and libraries.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 06:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: elninotheblog</title>
		<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-741</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:41:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-741</guid>
					<description>Thanks for this post - I am reading it in 2008-and you are a time traveller. This appears to be one of those things that is happening in the world all at once. People must begin to think for themselves again. This has been lost to a large degree because of the exploitation of the limitations of radio and television. Goodbye one way street!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks for this post - I am reading it in 2008-and you are a time traveller. This appears to be one of those things that is happening in the world all at once. People must begin to think for themselves again. This has been lost to a large degree because of the exploitation of the limitations of radio and television. Goodbye one way street!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thuan Huynh</title>
		<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-551</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 23:08:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-551</guid>
					<description>Hello Ellyssa,

(Sorry for the repost of my comment) I stumbled your great article and would like to submit it to
Traduwiki.org to get it translated in other languages than English.

Traduwiki is a project that intends to promote great articles to broader international audience. The process is simple and pretty straight forward. Each text is broken into smaller chunks. Users collaborate on the translations like in any other wikis. They can pick the text portions they'd like and can translate. Chunks are then put back together to form the translated text. This way, users wouldn't get bored too quickly or feel the pain to translate a long text by themselves. Currently, Spanish and Russian users are the most active, but the French translators are coming faster than expected.

As the project mainly deals with texts under an open source or Creative Commons licenses, I wonder if you would agree to have your article on the site. Translated articles will be under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license.

I hope you would agree. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hello Ellyssa,</p>
	<p>(Sorry for the repost of my comment) I stumbled your great article and would like to submit it to<br />
Traduwiki.org to get it translated in other languages than English.</p>
	<p>Traduwiki is a project that intends to promote great articles to broader international audience. The process is simple and pretty straight forward. Each text is broken into smaller chunks. Users collaborate on the translations like in any other wikis. They can pick the text portions they&#8217;d like and can translate. Chunks are then put back together to form the translated text. This way, users wouldn&#8217;t get bored too quickly or feel the pain to translate a long text by themselves. Currently, Spanish and Russian users are the most active, but the French translators are coming faster than expected.</p>
	<p>As the project mainly deals with texts under an open source or Creative Commons licenses, I wonder if you would agree to have your article on the site. Translated articles will be under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license.</p>
	<p>I hope you would agree. What do you think?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terry</title>
		<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-421</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:31:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-421</guid>
					<description>There are presently at the moment some very good blogs doing the rounds. The authors provide advice on a variety of subjects. Some of this advice is very professional and helpful. This advice is far better than paid professional advice on occasions.
Terry
http://www.psychic-aus.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>There are presently at the moment some very good blogs doing the rounds. The authors provide advice on a variety of subjects. Some of this advice is very professional and helpful. This advice is far better than paid professional advice on occasions.<br />
Terry<br />
<a href='http://www.psychic-aus.com' rel='nofollow'>http://www.psychic-aus.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Publishing 2.0</title>
		<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-402</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 05:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-402</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Structured Blogging Does Exist&lt;/strong&gt;

Leave it to a librarian to demonstrate that blog posts don&amp;#8217;t have to be free-wheeling, loosely-structured, rambling opinion pieces with healthy doses of rant and snark, but can instead be structured, elegantly-organized, thoughtful and sober expl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Structured Blogging Does Exist</strong></p>
	<p>Leave it to a librarian to demonstrate that blog posts don&#8217;t have to be free-wheeling, loosely-structured, rambling opinion pieces with healthy doses of rant and snark, but can instead be structured, elegantly-organized, thoughtful and sober expl&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wanderings...</title>
		<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-66</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 20:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-66</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Turning Thinking Into Practice&lt;/strong&gt;

I have not posted in awhile.&amp;nbsp; Time is such an issue....&amp;nbsp; 
Web and blog evaluation are always...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Turning Thinking Into Practice</strong></p>
	<p>I have not posted in awhile.&nbsp; Time is such an issue&#8230;.&nbsp;<br />
Web and blog evaluation are always&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Library Views 圖書館觀點</title>
		<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-56</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-56</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;如何衡量 Blog 的可信度?&lt;/strong&gt;

	根據 Technorati  2月份所發佈的部落格(Blog) 現況報告中指出，全球部落格總數已超過2,700萬，為三年前的60倍，而其中有270萬個部落格至少每週更新，平均每天有120萬新頁面，可說是人類史上最...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>如何衡量 Blog 的可信度?</strong></p>
	<p>	根據 Technorati  2月份所發佈的部落格(Blog) 現況報告中指出，全球部落格總數已超過2,700萬，為三年前的60倍，而其中有270萬個部落格至少每週更新，平均每天有120萬新頁面，可說是人類史上最&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jacquie Henry</title>
		<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-54</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-54</guid>
					<description>This post is an answer to a question that I have been pondering for a long time.  Thanks you SO much for posting it.  I will be reading and thinking about it this week while I am on a break.

I was tracking information on this topic on my own blog. In looking over the post, I realized that I had some private info on there.  So I removed it.  Hopefully in the next few days I will be able to make it &quot;presentable&quot; again and put it back.  Thanks again for the post.  It is extremely helpful to those charged with teaching students how to evaluate what they read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This post is an answer to a question that I have been pondering for a long time.  Thanks you SO much for posting it.  I will be reading and thinking about it this week while I am on a break.</p>
	<p>I was tracking information on this topic on my own blog. In looking over the post, I realized that I had some private info on there.  So I removed it.  Hopefully in the next few days I will be able to make it &#8220;presentable&#8221; again and put it back.  Thanks again for the post.  It is extremely helpful to those charged with teaching students how to evaluate what they read.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wanderings...</title>
		<link>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-53</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/#comment-53</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Evaluating Blogs&lt;/strong&gt;


An LM_NET post of mine from Spring of 2005
My professional reading lately has been focused on wikis...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Evaluating Blogs</strong></p>
	<p>An LM_NET post of mine from Spring of 2005<br />
My professional reading lately has been focused on wikis&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
